Maximize Your Performance By Training For The Right Muscle Fiber Type

muscle_structure

There was a very interesting article posted over on the Performance Menu forums a few days ago: Muscles, Genes, and Athletic Performance. I’m also going to use these two articles in this post: Skeletal Muscle Fiber Type Part I and Part II.

The crux of the article is about genetic engineering and “genetic doping” at the elite athletic level. But there’s some interesting stuff in there for the rest of us, from a performance perspective. Note that much of the article and my discussion invokes sprinting, but sprinters aren’t the only ones that can make use of this information. Sprinting just happens to be the best example of raw speed.

Anatomy Of A Muscle

The image above does a good job of showing the overall structure of a muscle. Basically, a muscle is a bundle of cells called fibers, or more technically myocytes. A fiber is a bundle of myofibrils that run the full length of the cell. Each myofibril is composed of contractile units called sarcomeres, which are in turn composed of filaments known as actin and myosin that slide together to produce contraction. Here is a visual of the actin/myosin interaction snagged from Page 4 of the PDF above.

actin-myosin

A component of the myosin molecule is known as the “heavy chain” and determines the overall functional characteristics of the muscle fiber. So in order of smallest to largest: actin & myosin -> sarcomere -> myofibril -> myocyte (fiber) -> “the muscle”.

Muscle Fiber Types

Now, let’s have a brief overview of the types of muscle fibers that are found in all mammals. At a base level, there are two fiber types: slow-twitch (Type I) and fast-twitch (Type II). Fast-twitch is further divided into Types IIa, IIx, and IIb, in increasing order of speed of contraction. Humans possess Type IIa and Type IIx, whereas the fastest muscle type, Type IIb is found in animals like small rodents.

Here is a table from Brian Mackenzie that describes the base attributes of the 3 fiber types. I copied this exactly, but it’s likely the final column should be Type IIx rather than Type IIb since as far as I’ve found, Type IIb is not found in humans.
[TABLE=9]

As you can see, as you go up the scale, you increase speed of force production, but you decrease the ability of the muscle to sustain maximal force production. A simple example is sprinting versus jogging. If Usain Bolt tried to run a mile at the speed he runs his 100-200m sprints, he’d make it…approximately 200m before slowing to a crawl. The muscle fibers that produce 100m speed don’t have the endurance to produce that speed over 1600m, which is why the record for the 1 mile run is around 3:45, rather than the 2:35 it would be if Bolt could sustain his 100m world record pace for another 1500m.

The Type IIa muscle fiber is essentially a hybrid of the Type I and Type IIx fibers. It possesses some characteristics of the Type I fiber, namely a higher oxidative capacity than Type IIx fibers, along with some characteristics of the Type IIx fiber, such as being about five times faster to fully contract than a slow-twitch fiber (for comparison, the Type IIx fiber contracts about 10x faster than Type I).

Strength Characteristics Of The Muscle Types

So we know that Type II fibers are faster than Type I and that Type IIx is faster than Type IIa. But what about in terms of strength?

Gram for gram, the two types are not different in the amount of force they produce, only their rate of force production. So, having a lot of fast twitch fibers only makes a positive difference when the time available for force production is very limited (milliseconds), like the 100ms or so the foot is in contact with the ground during a sprint or long jump. It makes no difference to the powerlifter who may use 3-4 seconds to execute a slow, smooth lift.

So fiber type doesn’t determine raw strength potential. It can only determine power potential, i.e., force over time. An example is picking 250lbs off the floor. Picking up 250lbs is picking up 250lbs whether it takes you 1 second or 1 minute. But doing it in 1 second is significantly more explosive and powerful than doing it in 1 minute.

Muscle Type Conversion And The “Overshoot” Principle

Okay, so basically we all have muscles made up of the three main types of muscle fibers (counting IIa and IIx as different fiber types) and the fibers in turn determine how good we are at specific sports. A person with lots of slow-twitch fibers will never make a good sprinter. Someone born with lots of fast-twitch muscle will probably gravitate to sprinting rather than distance running. Let’s get down to what we really care about…is it possible to “configure” your muscles to excel in your chosen sport?

The average active person has about 50% slow-twitch and 50% fast-twitch fibers throughout their body, with about 5% being the super fast Type IIx. An elite sprinter on the other hand has around 20% slow-twitch, 45% Type IIa, and 35% Type IIx. For a world-class marathoner, you’re looking more like 80:20 slow-twitch to fast-twitch, with virtually no Type IIx.

Converting One To The Other

Is it possible to change your muscle fiber composition? Technically, yes, a muscle fiber can change its type. This happens commonly between Type IIa and Type IIx (in both directions) with training. But can Type I fibers become Type II fibers or vice versa? Evidence in this area is weak, but it does appear that Type I fibers can convert to Type IIa fibers with the traditional tools used by sprinters to increase speed. If Type IIa fibers can convert to Type I, the conversion is very slow and there’s no evidence to prove it happens as there are no before-and-after biopsies done on marathoners.

Bulking Up

Unfortunately, you cannot grow new muscle fibers. If a muscle has ten fibers today, it’ll have ten fibers tomorrow and ten the day after that (it could actually have 9 or 8 as people lose muscle fibers through aging, but it’ll never have 11 or 12). But you can grow new myofibrils within the fibers, so all isn’t lost. Basically, you’re increasing the size of the fibers, not increasing the number of fibers.

So if you workout in a way that grows your Type IIa and IIx fibers, you can change the overall ratio of Type I-to-Type II muscle mass, though the ratio of actual fibers remains the same. The slow-twitch fibers don’t tend to bulk and heavy strength training converts Type IIx fibers to Type IIa (relax, we’ll come back to this). Effectively, by strength training, you are pushing your muscles towards that Type IIa fiber that has some component of power and some component of endurance.

Overshooting

Here’s a very interesting phenomenon discussed in the paper: overshoot.

As expected, the relative amount of the fast myosin IIx isoform in their vastus lateralis muscle was reduced from an average of 9 percent to about 2 percent in the resistance-training period. We then expected that the relative amount of the IIx isoform would simply return to the pretraining level of 9 percent during the period of inactivity. Much to our surprise, the relative amount of myosin IIx reached an average value of 18 percent three months into the detraining.

Physiologically, there’s no real explanation for why this happens. The question is, do we care why? Understanding that a tapering period before a major competition will bring about a significant increase in our fastest muscle fibers is enough. Sprinters use this to their advantage all the time before their most important meets…it’s called “peaking”.

Then again, the deloading period in the study was 3 months, which is unreasonable for an athlete. How much of “peaking” is a result of overshoot vs. simple recovery? Unfortunately there’s no way to know just yet. Again though, the phenomenon is interesting from a science-geek perspective, but knowing that tapering works is enough until we’re able to better take advantage of the science behind it.

Training For Sport

So which is better? That’s an impossible question to answer. For the average person, the standard mix of about 50% slow twitch and 50% fast twitch is just fine. But for the athlete interested in improving performance in their chosen sport, it is a very important question. Other than running/rowing/cycling for long periods of time, I can’t think of any sport that wouldn’t benefit from the raw power of the fastest-twitch muscles.

Obviously, the short sprints (200m and below) in track and field rely heavily on the fastest fibers we have, but every field event is also reliant on a very quick, explosive movement to move either an external object (shot put, discus, javelin) or to move the body itself (pole vault, high/long/triple jump). Sports like basketball, baseball, football, and soccer are characterized by bursts of speed or jumping intermixed with periods of light to no effort.

Given that, unless you’re a distance athlete, you probably have enough slow-twitch muscle fibers and would benefit from devoting some time to increasing the size of your fast-twitch fibers. But frankly, who really cares about muscle fiber composition? The important thing is performance.

Training For Power

But since we’re here, let’s look at the kinds of activities that increase power, focusing prominently on growing our fast-twitch muscles, the ones that increase our speed and ability to jump. Basically the goal is to increase the size of our engine (get stronger) while also keeping or increasing the firing rate of that engine.

  • Heavy Strength Training – High weight (85% of 1-rep max or more), low reps in exercises like the deadlift and back squat for serious posterior chain targeting, as well as bench press and overhead press (don’t neglect the upper body here). The goal is to try to move the weight as quickly as possible (with good form, of course), whether the weight actually moves quickly or not. This focuses on increasing the overall size of the Type IIa muscles (bigger engines). Some Type IIx will convert to Type IIa as will some Type I.
  • Plyometrics – Depth jumps, bounding, explosive skips…all work to give a very quick stretch-reflex that is difficult to mimic in any other way. It teaches the muscles to fire hard and fast and I can’t think of any other movement that is as quick as things like depth jumps and bounds. Ease into plyometrics slowly as they are intense and very hard on muscles and connective tissues. Here are a few precautions and some ideas for plyometric workouts.
  • Sprinting – If you want to jump higher, you’d incorporate plenty of jumping in your training protocol. So if you want to be able to outsprint the next guy, whether you’re a wide receiver that needs to blow past a cornerback or a 1-mile runner wanting a stronger kick at the end of the final lap, sprinting more will speed you up. Uphill & downhill sprints are great, but the incline should not increase or decrease your speed by more than 10%.
  • Olympic Lifts – While not as quick as the short time your foot is planted when running full speed, the Olympic lifts are great for teaching you to activate explosively. Hang power cleans are the easiest to perform without instruction, but a few sessions with an Olympic lifting coach might be good.

What other ways have you used to successfully increase your speed?

About Scott

Scott Kustes loves to cook and loves to eat. He started Real Food University to help you get maximum enjoyment out of the meals that you eat. To find out more about how he has rebelled against the fast food culture and counting calories or carbs, join the Real Food Revolution.

17 Reader Comments


  1. Jay Cohen on

    Great article, very timely for me as I’m moving outdoors to start training for some short 400/800 races this summer.

    Thanks.

  2. Yavor - Relative Strength Advantage on

    Very comprehensive article. Bookmarked for quick reference. Thanks.

  3. Son of Grok on

    Recently started incorporating the plyo jumps. Way better of an exercise than I could every have imagined.

    The SoG

  4. Steve Shafley on

    While this article is informative, does it really change the way anybody will train? Especially for strength and power? No, it doesn’t.

    In fact, it’s a bit dated, since the paper that spawned it has a copyright of 2000, and (paraphrased from my labcoat buddy, Matt Perryman during a similar conversation):

    “You need to check into some of the more recent material on calcineurin triggering a shift away from MHC IIx and towards IIa. The net effect is that calcium release, and thus any contraction of the fiber, is creating a shift towards IIa expression.

    MHC IIx is thought to only dominate in fibers that are very rarely used. Which is why it overshoots during detraining. Any fiber regularly trained will trend towards IIa dominance.”

    Also, if I’m remembering correctly, from when I delved into this topic a while back, the transition of IIs to I-like occurs due to chronic stimulation (and in rat studies, not human studies)

    So, while it’s interesting physiologically, practically, for an athlete, unless you are completely ignorant of training science or S&C principles, you’re already doing what you need to do.

  5. skustes on

    Jay, how’s the training going? I had my first meet this past Friday…ran an untrained 62.78 in the 400m (indoor). Probably could’ve taken another 3 or 4 seconds off had I had some competition, but the nearest person was 3 seconds behind me.

    SoG, just be careful with them. I injured my hamstring tendon last year getting into too much plyo work too quickly. That put a serious damper on my training.

    Cheers
    Scott

  6. skustes on

    Hey Shaf,
    Interesting points from your friend….I’ll have to look more into that. Probably doesn’t change much for those of us already training for strength and power, but the prevailing exercise orthodoxy doesn’t seem to think in this way.

    Cheers
    Scott

  7. Mike OD on

    Always good to see the Shaf man!

  8. Jay Cohen on

    Scott;

    Nice time. My training program is still a work in progress, I have a local track coach working on it, will up load for comments once I receive. I’d be pretty happy with a 60-62 for the 400

  9. Steve Shafley on

    An additional bit which I thought was a nice breakdown on this:

    “There are three MHC types expressed in humans: IIx, IIa and I. Given that any fiber contains two heavy myosin strands, the following combinations are possible:

    IIx + IIx = pure IIx
    IIx + IIa = IIax
    IIa + IIa = pure IIa
    IIa + I = IIc or Ic depending on motor unit type (fast or slow)
    I + I = pure I

    As it was said, motor unit activity dictates MHC content of the fiber, so fast motor units can have the following assosciated fiber types depending on activity:

    IIx
    IIax
    IIa
    IIc

    And slow motor units can have the following assosciated fiber types depending on activity:

    I
    Ic”

    “You will NEVER make a Type I MHC express as Type II. Because that is determined by the motor nerve and those don’t change (short of surgical reattachment). You can shift up and down within a given type (e.g. training turns IIx into IIa and detraining turns IIa into IIx) but not within types (e.g. I->II or II->I).”

  10. skustes on

    Good stuff Shaf! Thanks for adding to the discussion. Would it be correct that IIax is really the fastest type that humans will express much of when they’ve been training? Just wondering since IIx really seems to be more of a default, untrained setting.

    Cheers
    Scott

  11. Steve Shafley on

    I’m not sure if the IIax wouldn’t convert to a IIa rapidly during training.

    Essentially this is simply a case of your body becoming better at what you do. Lift heavy, run fast, jump high? You get better at it.

    Send mixed messages, and you’ll get mixed results.

    Issurin’s block periodization text is really a very interesting, and not terribly technical read that relates somewhat to this topic.

    I’ve always felt that other factors, like limb length, levers, muscle and connective tissue attachments and the nervous system were all more important than fiber type to an athlete.

  12. Scott N on

    Hey Scott

    Could you explain “peaking” a little bit more. I’m having trouble understanding it, and other websites don’t really explain it all that well.

    Thanks in advance,

  13. skustes on

    Scott N, basically the goal is to be in the best shape entering your event. So as an example, I have 3 more track meets, conveniently spaced about 6 weeks apart. That gives me time to train and aim for a goal (55 second 400m) at the end of April, then aim for a higher goal in early June, and finally a peak at the end of July (52-second 400m is the goal). Those each qualify as peaks, but the goal is to increase your peak as the season progresses. Train, train, train, taper, peak for the first event; train, train, train, taper, peak higher for the second event; train, train, train, taper, 3rd peak for final meet.

    Us “old guys” (i.e., those not in high school/college) don’t have access to as many meets as organized track teams, so picking peak points is easy…it’s where the 3 meets fall. But in high school, it was 2 meets per week, so you pick big events for your peaks and just use the other meets as training. Then you taper your training before those “peaking” events. So the 10 days before my meets, I’ll start cutting volume (maintaining intensity) and take a couple days off for rest right beforehand.

    You should be aching to go when the day of your event/game rolls around, not dragging in from too much training. Basically you have to understand that you’re unlikely to make much progress in the last week or so. All you’re likely to do is tire yourself out and decrease your event performance. You are only going to get a day or two of peak performance, so the goal is to time it to coincide with a big game.

    Of course, you have to figure out for yourself what works best, but tapering training is pretty much a given.

    Cheers
    Scott

  14. skustes on

    Hey Shaf, checking out some stuff on Issurin’s periodization. I found out the hard way last year about connective tissue…jumped into plyometrics (no pun intended) too hard, too fast and tweaked my hamstring tendon in my right leg. That kept me from really training hard enough to do as well as I could’ve in the Bluegrass State Games.

    I think you’re probably right about limb length, etc. Usain Bolt is an anomaly in being such a tall 100m guy. I’d bet powerlifters and Olympic lifters have an optimal height as well. Really just find the science behind it cool.

    Cheers
    Scott

  15. Steve Shafley on

    Be careful. One thing Issurin does illustrate pretty good in his text is how complex periodization schemes (‘sup Gregg!) are decent for low level athletes but not for elite (read national, international, and Olympic) level performances.

    You may end up polluted with Eastern European performance ideology.

  16. skustes on

    Point taken Shaf. Mainly just looking out of interest. My training through July is all pretty well laid out for track, so not going to change anything up right now. Not sure I’ll even buy his book at this point. Just looking to see if there are any good ‘net resources on it.

    Cheers
    Scott

  17. Fred on

    I may be too late asking questions in this thread, but…

    Has anyone tried and evaluated (or even thought about) Art De Vanys Fast Twitch Threshold Sets? As he describes them in his Evolutionary Fitness essay.

    / Fred.

Feel free to leave a comment below... and as always please keep it in good taste. Comment spamming ONLY to promote your website is NOT allowed. So please use your real name in the field below otherwise it may be edited or removed. Constructive discussion is always welcome, personal attacks or useless bickering is not. Not all comments may be answered directly by editors/writers.

You must be logged in to post a comment.