Picking the Right Tool for the Job, Part 2: Developing Base Fitness

Developing GPP
Get Your GPP On

A few weeks ago, I wrote a post titled Picking The Right Tool For The Job – GPP vs. SPP. This post was a high-level discussion of when to incorporate General Physical Preparedness into your training and when to switch to Specialized Physical Preparation. Today, I want to look at what exactly GPP is and why it’s needed.

Defining GPP
GPP stands for General Physical Preparedness, if I haven’t mentioned that enough times. It is exactly what the name says: a general level of physical conditioning upon which to build sport specific skills. If one were to build a “Fitness Pyramid,” GPP would be the base. I really like the Ten Physical Skills that CrossFit uses, which I believe was developed by Jim Cawley of Dynamax. There are any number of “competing” paradigms, typically covering the same skills in some fashion, but this one resonates with me. They are:

  • Cardiorespiratory Endurance
  • Stamina
  • Strength
  • Flexibility
  • Power
  • Speed
  • Coordination
  • Accuracy
  • Agility
  • Balance

Any good GPP program should be addressing each of these skills. That is the failing of most people’s programs, especially non-athletes. Most people are focusing predominantly on two of these skills: strength and cardiorespiratory endurance. You know this training program. It’s something like, “Monday: chest and tris; Wednesday: Back and bis; Friday: Legs; Tuesday and Thursday: Run 5 miles”. Some people omit the running, some people omit the lifting, further reducing their overall capacity. But most people are neglecting to build all ten skills. They may look good at the beach, but their functionality is quite limited.

Why These Ten Skills?
As I said, these ten skills are just one example of how to define “fitness”. Basically, you can say that GPP is fitness. That’s essentially what CrossFit bills itself as: “The Sport Of Fitness.” I like these ten because it shows the need to be a well-rounded athlete, not just a super-strong behemoth that can lift 600lbs from the floor, but can’t run around the block or someone that can run for days but can’t lift a bag of cat food overhead (yes, those are intentionally exaggerated).

These ten skills illustrate that there is always some area that you can improve. So you’re strong, but are you powerful? You have speed, but do you have any endurance? (Oh wait, that last one is directed at me!) You’re a yoga god(dess), but what else can you do?

Having a strong base level of GPP means being able to handle what life throws at you. “What’s that Lassie? Timmy fell down a well? Good thing I have a strong base level of fitness so I can run the mile to get there and still have the strength and stamina to pull him back out.” A good fitness program means that when you shoot 1000lbs of buffalo, you’ll be able to carry more than 100lbs back to your wagon. And on top of that, being functionally fit typically means that you look good to boot! Sounds like a win-win.

How Much GPP Do You Need In Your Program?
Now this is an easy question to answer. Ready? The answer is *ahem* “It depends.” It depends on:

  • Your Goals
  • Your Current Fitness Level

Goals
How do goals influence how much GPP you should do? The way I see it, the main “goal” that influences your focus on GPP is “what level of specialization are you seeking?” If your goal is just to be in shape, a solid GPP program can make up the entirety of your fitness program. I’m partial to CrossFit, but any well-designed fitness program can cover those ten variables.

For most of the population, this type of program is all that’s needed. Most people need the strength, flexibility, stamina, and balance to operate successfully in normal life. Fitness is as, if not more, important to the elderly than to the young. The intensity may vary, but these areas are as important in maintaining independence into old age as they are in maintaining a high level of athleticism or the ability to carry a 225lb unconscious man from a burning building. To paraphrase Greg Glassman, “throughout life, needs vary only in degree, not in kind.” Granny doesn’t need to be able to deadlift double her body weight or crank out ten straight pistols. She does need to be able to stand up from a chair and walk down the hall without falling.

The second group of the population that benefits greatly from a high level of general fitness is the First Responder group. Law enforcement, EMTs, and military all need the capacity to handle whatever life throws at them. An officer needs to be able to chase down a criminal and then still have the capacity to subdue the guy. And there’s just not telling what situation a soldier may find him/herself in. There’s a reason that CrossFit is so popular amongst these groups.

But what about someone training for a specific event? Someone with a desire to specialize necessarily has to give up some level of general fitness. For instance, a marathon runner typically forfeits strength and power in favor of cardiorespiratory endurance. A powerlifter probably gives up cardiorespiratory endurance, stamina, and speed in favor of strength. We could continue picking specialists and seeing where their weaknesses are, but the key fact is that the further towards elite-level specialization that you go, the more glaring the weaknesses become in some of these ten skills.

While a specialist will spend more time focusing on his sport-specific skills, there is still a need to develop base fitness. I recall an article by Coach Rut in one of the CrossFit Journals that described the improvements in a group of high school powerlifters by putting them on a broad fitness program, CrossFit or some variant. Strength and power training benefit distance runners. Louie Simmons of Westside Barbell uses lots of sub-maximal speed-strength (or is it strength-speed?) lifting to develop insane amounts of pure maximal strength. So there is carry-over in that one skill benefits another.

Current Fitness Level
Current fitness level also has a big influence on how much focus you put on building your fitness base. An athlete that’s been training for years probably has a solid enough GPP base to spend most of their time focusing on their specialization. A sedentary desk jockey will reap greater benefits from building fitness across broad modalities than from building strength or endurance only. Even if the athlete hasn’t been focusing on anything but his/her sport, he will likely reduce weaknesses much faster than someone lacking across the board. As I said, one skill benefits others.

Scaling is a big area of concern when adopting a program as potent as CrossFit. You can burn yourself out and injure yourself very quickly if you just pick up the Workout Of The Day from the main page and go at it full-force, day-in, day-out. The average person lacks the fitness level to accomplish those workouts without destroying themselves. But scaled versions (an area that CrossFit doesn’t adequately touch on) with lower weights or modified exercises are accessible to everyone from the most athletic to the most sedentary. Your grandmother could develop essential fitness for normal living with a properly-designed CrossFit (or other form of GPP) workout.

So In The End…
GPP does not build better sports players. GPP will not necessarily make you a better basketball player. It will not necessarily make you a better football player. But a well-designed GPP program will make you a better athlete. And being a better athlete means you will be better able to leverage that into being a better shooting basketball player, a harder-hitting football player, a tennis player with an ace serve, or a gymnast with better strength and stability.

But the average person has little concern over punching power, shooting three-pointers, running through tackles, or throwing a shot put 70 feet. For most people, following a workout like CrossFit, scaled to their level of fitness, will yield far greater results for everyday living than will the programs most people are doing.

Let’s Discuss It
I’d like to see the trainers, the non-trainers, the athletes, the non-athletes, and everyone else (if you don’t classify yourself in one of the other categories) discuss three things:

  • Is my description of GPP correct?
  • Just how much focus on GPP should there be for a specialist?
  • Does the normal person have a need (ignoring desires) for non-GPP focused work?
  • How do you time GPP when working with an athlete and when do you switch over to SPP?

Obviously you’re free to discuss whatever else you want too.

About Scott

Scott Kustes loves to cook and loves to eat. He started Real Food University to help you get maximum enjoyment out of the meals that you eat. To find out more about how he has rebelled against the fast food culture and counting calories or carbs, join the Real Food Revolution.

7 Reader Comments


  1. Mark Salinas on

    GPP I love it! Great article with so much valuable information!

  2. Kyle Marston on

    It seems like there are some higher profile CF affiliates that are not giving up GPP in favor of SPP but rather trying to combine the two (e.g. the Crossfit Endurance, CA, NavySeals.com’s of the world). What are your thoughts on these approaches? Do they lose something by taking the middle ground between to two or would you say their posted WOD’s are still mainly GPP for the average athlete only with a particular bias?

  3. Kyle S. on

    I love GPP, if you’re not a competive sport player its the ideal model IMO. However I have a question. I believe a higher level of strength is more important to GPP then a high level of endurance. Discuss.

  4. DaveC - DaveGetsFit on

    I think you hit a good point when you talked about scaling. I’m sure that a very small percentage of people who visit the Crossfit website can do the WODs as RXd. There’s a huge population of males out there who, like me, can’t do a decent pull up. That kind of shoots Fran out of the water from the git-go. So, yea, basing a program on Crossfit principles is a good idea–putting it into practice for some will take some thought and experimentation.

  5. Troy V - South Baltimore CrossFit on

    I’m a new CrossFit trainer and I think your description of GPP is spot on. Coming from a lifting background, until I found CF I really didn’t realize how much of my fitness potential was being left untouched. I lifted and lifted, but wasn’t getting any better at sport, because I wasn’t building a complete foundation.

    Answering your question regarding how much GPP is necessary for a specialist is difficult without knowing more. There are specialists and there are specialists, really. My sport right now is Australian rules football, and it heavily rewards GPP. Your task on the field is largely variable from moment to moment. You could be asked to leap up in a crowd to catch a ball, break a tackle, evade a tackle, scoop up a ball bouncing erratically , and chase down an opponent all in the same minute. A football lineman, however, has a very defined task. He knows within a few seconds how long each play will last, and largely what his job will be. We see his incomplete GPP when he recovers a fumble in the open field and runs out of gas before he can reach the endzone. No one finds this strange because sprinting 80 yards is not in his regular job description, and even though it does happen sometimes, building the ability to sprint 80 yards would hurt his ability to do the things he does day in and day out. This isn’t a value judgment, and I hope to preempt the inflamed response by saying that football lineman are extraordinary athletes, with much more agility and speed than most people know. The fact is that we as trainers (even if only self-training) really need to understand the specialty, if any, and know that the more defined the task, the more specialized training will be needed. Look, CrossFit is awesome; I love it and it’s a very comprehensive toolbox for athletics. More often than not, it does contain the right tool. We trainers just need to make sure and not confuse a “very comprehensive” toolbox with and “exhaustive” one.

    I’d also like to note that I’m speaking from a trainers perspective and am only talking about things that are fitness based, not skill based. I won’t be coaching athletes on their tennis serve, and even though those things are physical in nature and do require adaptation, actually honing a skill should be dealt with separately. I do think there’s huge value in practicing an already earned skill under duress, however. 20 kettlebell swings and 6 fair serves, 5 rounds for time. Tennis anyone? I think it’s that sort of thing, or pushing a sled for a lineman, that we mean by sport specific training.

    I don’t think that there is a concrete need for sport specific work for the everyday person. In fact, one of the great benefits of CrossFit is that it allows people to scratch their competitive itch without being part of a traditional sport. For me though, there is something more to team sports than CrossFit can offer by itself. I guess something about two groups of men meeting on a field and only one leaving the victor touches something primal, I don’t know. Being part of a sport gives a specific purpose to my workouts, and when I look back at the dog-tired opponent behind me, it’s somehow more fulfilling and affirming than shaving seconds off my “Fran” time.

    Even though it may not be necessary, I do think that there is great personal benefit from picking things to focus on here and there. One of the best things that CrossFit gave me was a sudden broad fitness foundation. A stepping stone to go dabble in whatever sport realm I choose. It’s precisely these specializations that make us unique and interesting, and even though the end result of a comprehensive GPP program like CrossFit is a large mass of very fit generalists, I don’t think that’s really the point. One of the great values of GPP is that you can go specialize if you want, and then turn around after a while and specialize in something else. Is focused work necessary for a fit, healthy, and happy life? No. I would absolutely say, though, that taking some small hits in some aspects of your GPP to go focus on a healthy pursuit will pay off in the end.

    Loved the “Oregon Trail” reference, by the way.

  6. Scott Kustes on

    Kyle M., I haven’t checked out what all of the affiliates are doing, so I can’t speak from any real level of knowledge here. I’d say that you can tend towards one area of specialization or another slightly without major losses in other areas. However, when you start chasing higher levels of performance in, say, sprint speed, distance running, strength, etc, you are going to give something up in another area. So if a perfect GPP base gives you an 8/10 in all areas, not excelling, but also not having any deficiencies, you may be able to bump one or two up to an 8.5 without taking hits.

    Kyle S., I agree. Strength helps to build endurance before endurance helps to build strength, especially in a program like CrossFit. You see a lot of distance guys that come to CF workouts and flounder because they lack the strength. When a person with a powerlifting background comes to the game though, they typically make nice jumps quickly because they can throw the weights around.

    Troy, you win the prize, which is….nothing. But I was waiting for someone to catch the Oregon Trail reference. You’re right…there are certain sports that reward generalism more than specialization, your sport being one (though I don’t know the rules of Aussie football). On a football field, certain positions are more generalists, for instance a safety vs. a lineman. I agree with you that there’s something to pursuing excellence in one area, even if you have to give up something. Obviously I do just that in pursuing sprinting…my endurance is only decent. My 5k and 10k times suffer a bit, perhaps 8 minute miles, but I don’t enjoy those events, so it doesn’t bother me. I like your idea for tennis…reminds me of things I’ve heard of like doing a round of Helen, then playing chess for a certain period of time; thinking under extreme physical duress.

    And I love that you make note that CF is not the perfect toolbox for everyone. I think some new trainers come to it and have found this wonderful new hammer that’s made them much fitter than they were before. They then neglect to see anything outside of their new world view, which I think you can see from the trainer that sparked my initial post on this topic.

    Cheers
    Scott

  7. What is GPP? on

    [...] Kustes of Modern Forager just wrote a great article on GPP (General Physical [...]

Feel free to leave a comment below... and as always please keep it in good taste. Comment spamming ONLY to promote your website is NOT allowed. So please use your real name in the field below otherwise it may be edited or removed. Constructive discussion is always welcome, personal attacks or useless bickering is not. Not all comments may be answered directly by editors/writers.

You must be logged in to post a comment.